| |
The predominant emphasis in earthquake-resistant design practice is
on ductility. In reinforced concrete, ductility has traditionally
been achieved with monolithic construction and proper reinforcement
detailing, such as adequate concrete confinement. With steel structures,
moment-resisting frames with adequate connection details are a common
approach to ductile design. In highway structures, innovative restrainers
and isolation devices are also becoming more common. The limits of
ductility are steadily being pushed, and further improvements in ductility
will continue into the future.
Highly ductile systems must be well characterized to facilitate
performance-based design. Such characterization requires careful
experimentation coupled with the development of appropriate simulation
approaches. Many new bridge design and retrofit options that use
advanced materials and new combinations of traditional materials
are exhibiting very large ductilities. An example of a highly ductile
system is that of precast segmental concrete bridge piers with unbonded
vertical post-tensioning and localized use of highly ductile fiber-reinforced
concrete. Precast segmental bridge support systems have been implemented
in many non-seismic regions (Billington et al., 1999, Sritharan
et al., 1999). Unbonded post-tensioned bridge pier systems have
been receiving particular attention in seismic research across the
world (e.g., Kwan and Billington, 2002a,b, Kurama et al., 1999,
Ito et al., 1997, Mander and Chang, 1997, Priestley and MacRae,
1996, Priestley and Tao, 1993). The use of advanced ductile materials
in combination with unbonded post-tensioning is new and has first
been explored at Cornell.
One-fifth scale experiments on partial columns with unbonded post-tensioning
and localized use of the ductile composites have proven the feasibility
of this system (Yoon et al., 2002). As shown in Figures 1a and 1b,
it was found that the highly ductile concrete located in hinge regions
maintains its integrity beyond drifts of 20% while the unbonded
post-tensioning does not yield and thus minimizes any residual displacement
after reaching such high drifts. The load-carrying capacity of the
system was also maintained at these large drifts. Residual drifts
were on the order of 2-3%.
Experiments are now needed on full-height columns (roughly half-scale
will be feasible with the proposed facility) due to the use of unbonded
post-tensioning. Because the post-tensioning is unbonded, there
is no localized yielding of the post-tensioned steel. Strain induced
in the bridge columns is spread along the entire length of the post-tensioning.
Therefore full bridge piers using the full length of strand are
necessary for accurate investigation of such systems. Figure 1c
illustrates the experimental concept. Full bridge pier experiments
will require stroke capacities of 650-1000 mm. This facility will
include a modular 1.8-m-high low reaction wall and a modular 7.2-m-high
reaction wall. The experiments will be carried out on the upper
surface of the low reaction wall and lateral load would be applied
from the high portion of the strong wall. Equivalent gravity load
would be applied using high capacity (force) actuators that would
react off of the strong floor or off of a stiff frame supported
at the top of the reaction walls. This support system will be designed
to allow the actuators to move with the specimen as it undergoes
large drift cycles.
page 1 | page 2
|
|